The passage in 1 Cor. Does NOT utilize identity-words, it makes use of action words: “those who take, people who have drunk, people who revile, individuals who have intercourse with men”.
None among these are terms that basically refer to one’s identification, in Greek. They refer to actions that are one’s.
Kathy, praise Jesus for the testimony and it’s also great to know which you’ve been aided right right petite blowjob here. I shall truly just just take this into consideration whenever getting together with people connected with SF.
Nevertheless, taking a look at Daniel’s reactions (re: “I speak ancient Greek — therefore there’s exactly what 1 Cor. 6:9-11 says… that are‘really’. As though no one else has ever examined those verses – or lived them! ), you could be able understand why i will be extremely skeptical.
In addition, he hasn’t really addressed any of my concerns & he linked to an article about “divorce”, when my analogy was about adultery while I appreciate that Ron has engaged here.
Maybe, i ought to have drawn it away further: in case a married guy nevertheless experiences contrary intercourse attraction toward ladies who aren’t their spouse in a way for him to identify as an adulterous Christian that he is prone to fantasize about an adulterous affair, but he seeks help to battle the temptation, would it be proper? Needless to say perhaps maybe maybe not, unless apply the reasoning this web site right right here.